Headlines

6 Plot Holes NCIS: Origins Has Created Thus Far

Spread the love

Six Major Plot Holes Introduced by NCIS: Origins So Far

The NCIS franchise has spanned decades, captivating fans with intricate storylines, memorable characters, and an evolving narrative that has solidified its place as a staple in crime procedural television. However, as NCIS: Origins delves into the backstory of some of its most iconic characters and key events, fans have begun to notice discrepancies that clash with the established lore of the original series. Below, we explore six significant plot holes that NCIS: Origins has created, leaving fans scratching their heads.


1. Conflicting Timelines for Key Events

One of the most glaring issues is the timeline inconsistencies between NCIS: Origins and the original series. In NCIS, certain events and character backstories are explicitly tied to specific years. However, Origins occasionally places these events in different time periods or omits critical context, creating a confusing overlap. For example, the timeline of Gibbs’ early career in the Marines and his recruitment into NCIS doesn’t align seamlessly with the dates and anecdotes established in the original series, leaving fans questioning the accuracy of both.


2. Altered Backstories for Iconic Characters

Another contentious point is the rewriting of pivotal character histories. Gibbs, Tony, and Abby are among the most beloved characters whose backstories were deeply explored in NCIS. Origins has made changes to some of these narratives, sometimes contradicting previously established details. For instance, events in Gibbs’ life—such as his relationship with Shannon and his early career motivations—are portrayed with subtle but noticeable differences. These changes risk alienating long-time fans who have emotionally invested in these characters’ arcs over the years.


3. Discrepancies in Technology and Procedures

Despite being a prequel, NCIS: Origins often showcases technology and investigative techniques that feel too advanced for the time period it aims to depict. In the original NCIS, there was a clear evolution in forensic science and crime-solving methods over the years. However, Origins introduces tools and methodologies that seem anachronistic, creating a jarring contrast with the supposed timeline of the franchise. Fans have pointed out that these inaccuracies diminish the authenticity of the series as a prequel.


4. Overlapping Character Introductions

Several characters appear in Origins at times that contradict their original introductions in NCIS. For example, characters who were portrayed as newcomers in the main series are shown to have already crossed paths with the NCIS team in Origins. This not only undermines their original arcs but also creates confusion about the nature of their relationships. It also diminishes the impact of their original debuts, which were often designed to showcase fresh dynamics within the team.


5. Retcons That Undermine Original Storylines

Origins has introduced retcons—revised continuity—that occasionally undermine the emotional weight or logic of storylines from the original series. One notable example is the way certain missions or decisions are reframed in Origins, altering the motivations or consequences that were central to NCIS. These retcons can feel like a betrayal of the original narrative, especially when they contradict iconic moments or revelations.


6. Inconsistent Portrayal of Key Themes

The tone and themes of NCIS: Origins sometimes stray from the core values and atmosphere of the original series. While NCIS has always balanced serious drama with light-hearted moments, Origins leans heavily in one direction or the other, creating tonal inconsistencies. This shift not only affects the series’ overall feel but also raises questions about how the characters evolved into their established roles in the main series.


Conclusion

While NCIS: Origins offers fans an exciting glimpse into the early days of their favorite characters and storylines, the series has created a number of plot holes that challenge its credibility as a prequel. For devoted fans, these inconsistencies can be frustrating, as they clash with the detailed continuity that made NCIS so compelling in the first place. It remains to be seen whether the showrunners will address these issues or whether they will continue to build on this alternative version of events. For now, fans are left to reconcile the differences—or simply enjoy the ride.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *